Jan 11 2010 04:24 PM ET

Scoop: 'Brothers & Sisters' does the time warp!

Brothers & Sisters is flashing back to the ’70s and ’80s. The ABC drama is casting younger versions of the entire Walker clan for a special two-part episode set in 1973 and 1986. Among the roles the show is looking to fill:

William Walker at 33 (set in 1973)
Nora Walker at 28 (set in 1973)
Holly Harper at 21 (set in 1973)
Kevin Walker at 14 (set in 1986)
Kitty Walker at 18 (set in 1986)
Tommy Walker at 16 (set in 1986)
Sarah Walker at 20 (set in 1986)

Thoughts? Casting suggestions?

Comments (74 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3 4
  • BlatantURLPimpingMustDie

    Jason Dohring as Kitty!

  • Ed

    I actually think the actor who currently plays Ryan can play the younger Kitty. He has a soft, feminine face and can easily pass for a young Calista Flockhart (spelling?).

    • Rachel

      hahaha. So funny.

  • crispy

    I’m confused. In 1973, wouldn’t they all be really young, like infants? Justin wouldn’t even be born yet! How old are all the Walker siblings?

    • Sammi

      I was just thinking the exact same thing. Justin would not have even been born in 1973, although I believe all the other kids would have been born at least because they are all a good bit older than Justin as far as I know. I’m really excited about this idea and think it will be very cute to see the Walker siblings interacting as little kids but I hope the flashback year is a little later so Justin is at least 3 or so when this takes place because if it took place at a time when he isn’t born yet it wouldn’t be as good to me. I want them all to be shown.

    • crispy

      I’ll answer my own question! This is from December 2006, so not sure how much they’ve aged in the show since then:
      Sarah – 39
      Kitty – 38
      Tommy – 36
      Kevin – 34
      Justin – 26

    • KWise

      If you look above, they only have Nora, Holly, and William listed as appearing in the 1973 version.

    • MandyB

      JUSTIN isn’t even mentioned!! Go read the article again!!!

  • TheWalkers

    Sarah is 42, Kitty is 41, Tommy is 39, Kevin is 37, and Justin is 29.

    • TheWalkers

      oh, sorry

      • crispy

        No worries… I think we’re on the same page! So Justin and possibly even Kevin weren’t born in 1973. And the other three were 2, 4, and 5. In other words, I got no casting suggestions!

      • jordan

        Kevin Walker at 14 (set in 1986)
        Kitty Walker at 18 (set in 1986)
        Tommy Walker at 16 (set in 1986)
        Sarah Walker at 20 (set in 1986)

        they wouldn’t be in that part of the ep, they’d be in the part in the late 80′s

      • crispy

        He updated the post. Multiple times. (And for the record Ausiello, the standard protocol is to post “EDIT” when you make changes.) It originally just said 1973. But yeh, it makes a lot more sense now!

      • AJ

        Crispy – Ausiello is WAYYYYY too full of himself to admit an error. He just changes it and makes his loyal readers look like the ones who don’t know what they’re typing!

  • Maria

    This is COOL! We’ll get to see matriarch Nora having to deal with all those kids! And a thought, could she not just be preggo with Justin? I for one am excited

    • Sammi

      She wouldn’t even be pregnant with Justin in 1973. That’s about when Kevin would have been born and he is like 7 or 8 years older than Justin. I’m hoping that maybe the date is wrong because I would at least like him to be thought of when this flashback occurs lol.

  • Geo

    I think that it is a no-brainer to cast Taylor Lautner as Kevin.

    • Rachel

      What? That’s crazy. I think you’re lost. I’m sure there’s a Twilight message board somewhere that’s missing you.

      • Geo

        It’s called sarcasm, m’dear. Of course, TL DOES look tres gay.

  • Deven

    Are they using the Jump the Shark Casting Agency??!!

    • Buzz

      hahahaha :)

  • Cola

    Why do they want Nora at 28 and Sarah at 20? No wonder Nora’s so progressive after having her first child at the age of 8.

    • Sammi

      Haha yeah that’s really confusing not to mention if Sarah was 20 in 1973 that would make her 56 now. There has to be some mistake with this and still no mention of Justin (if you couldn’t tell he’s my favorite character lol). I’m VERY excited about this episode though so however they do it I’m sure it will be awesome! I absolutely love flashback episodes!

    • crispy

      LOL! This qualifies as most confusing EW post ever! Even with the changes he made, it’s a mess.

      • Guy

        Guys, what’s the problem with the post after the changes???

        Sarah was born in 66, according to the post, and in 66, Nora was 21, still according to the post!!!

      • SirLizard

        As of this moment (12:07 PM on 1/12/10) there is absolutely nothing confusing about the post. I’m sure the initial post must been a mess, but it is fine now.

  • Joe Brooks

    Sweet, so they are introducing Time Travel on Brothers & Sisters too? Hopefully they can go back in time and bring back young Tommy to the future to replace Balthazar Getty.

  • Al

    So, Nora was 8 when she had Sarah?

    • crispy

      It turns out Sarah is someone else’s daughter too! No wonder William was sleeping around… he was married to an 8-year-old.

  • Jennifer Anaya

    how can Nora be only 8 years older than Sarah, I am sure she had her kids young but that is pushing it a little.

  • Mary Q. Contrary

    I’m guessing he means 1983, guys. Chill out already.

    • Mary Q. Contrary

      Aha! Edited. Now it makes sense.

  • Alex

    I’m assuming that the entire episode is not set in 1973 and they must be shower later years as well because how could Nora be 28 and Sarah be 20? Even in the crazy Walker family I don’t think Nora would have been a mother at 8 years old.

    • Sammi

      See now that would make sense lol and I think that is an even cooler idea than just focusing on one year.

  • Geo

    The cast from Glee might be good, too.

    • nezo

      wait…what? LOL

  • Jenga

    I think only the Nora and William characters are for 1973. The others seem to be for a flashback to around 1991.

Page: 1 2 3 4
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP