Add this to the many questions left unanswered about Lost: Will Emmy honor the ABC drama for its final season? Unfortunately, there are no axioms to suggest that Emmy voters have soft spots in their hearts for groundbreaking and/or critically beloved shows that end their runs on broadcast or cable TV. For every Everybody Loves Raymond and The Sopranos (both of which won Emmys in their final seasons), there are many more shows that did not win the sentimental vote for Outstanding Drama or Outstanding Comedy after their curtain calls.
Nobody was surprised when the last seasons of, say, Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Gilmore Girls or even Battlestar Galactica didn’t earn Emmy nods; they weren’t as strong as previous seasons and the voters always ignored them when it came to the major categories, anyway. But when gold-standard dramas like The Wire and The Shield – two critically acclaimed shows that produced stellar final years — get the shaft, then it certainly provokes concern that maybe Emmy voters aren’t as in tune to good TV as we’d like to think. (Both dramas failed to ever earn nods in the Outstanding Drama category during their runs, though Michael Chiklis won a statue after his first year on the FX cop show while the HBO series got noms for writing.)
Another show facing the sentimental vote question is 24. Though it’s arguable whether the series deserves an Emmy nod for that (maddening!) final year that had Jack Bauer flying off the rails, voters might feel some sadness over having to say goodbye to Kiefer Sutherland’s beloved character, if not the show’s innovative format that we’re not likely to see again for a long time. Still, a nod in the Outstanding Drama category seems like a long shot. Lost, however, produced one of its finest years of TV: EW critic Ken Tucker describes the finale as “pretty delightful, full of reunions that were both emotional and funny.” Granted, the series already won for Outstanding Drama in 2005, but Emmy voters could bless the show with a nomination Thursday just for that heartfelt wrap-up in the church alone. The roadblock to a Lost win, however, is the actual screening process. Just like in years past, ABC insiders worry that Emmy voters — who now watch submissions from the comfort of their homes — may get lost watching Lost episodes if they haven’t followed the show since day one. Sighs one PR executive about the whole process, “After all these years, I’ve tried not to second-guess what happens. I just never know.”
We’ll give Emmy guru John Leverence the last word here. “When it comes to Academy voting patterns, viewer and voter loyalty is a factor on one side, and an ‘out with the old, in with the new’ sensibility is a factor on the other side,” says Leverence, who is the vice president of awards for the Academy of TV Arts and Sciences. “Both should be considered in a mix with the recent traction a show has with voters. Lost was nominated last year and 24 wasn’t, so Lost has two-thirds of that on its side — viewer loyalty plus a 2009 nomination — whereas 24 has one-third viewer loyalty but no 2009 nomination. Ditto two-thirds for Damages, nominated last year, and ditto one-third for Law & Order, not nominated last year. But this is more alchemy than chemistry, and the highly subjective factor of what kind of year a series is judged to have had is also critically important.”










Lost can be nominated, but The Good Wife deserves to win.
That is what I think too. I believe in this case that the nominatio will be enough of a win.
I might’ve agreed with you if The Good Wife had been as consistantly great as it was during it’s first half of the season. But the show started to loose me in the second half to the point where I find The Good Wife to be merely just good. That said, Julianna Margulies definitely deserves to win best actress.
You must be joking
I don’t think Lost should be nominated, because the last season was not worthy. However, I would love for Terry O’Quinn to get recognition. His work was outstanding throughout.
Totally agree. The final season was the weakest of the series, but Terry O’Quinn definitely deserves some Emmy love.
Really? Remember season 3…
i’m thinking season 4 was the weakest.
Yea, Jenny, we remember season 3. The first flash-forward that nobody knew was a flash forward, aka the best finale in the history of television. We also remember Desmond’s Flashes Before Your Eyes episode, Eko’s 23rd Psalm, and Charlie’s Greatest Hits. I find it hard to believe that season was the show’s LOW point.
I respectfully disagree. I think the last season was the best since the first. I loved (almost) every moment, and thought it ended on an intelligent, heartfelt note that was, in my opinion, the best moment of the entire series. I agree that O’Quinn deserves some love, but the standout of the season was Matthew Fox, for sure. He was more than he had ever been before, and then some. I feel like he tapped into Jack in a way very few actors have ever managed, and I was SERIOUSLY impressed.
I agree with Mary. I’m normally on the TO train but this season was Matthew Fox’s finest peformance to date. He deserves it.
I agree. Season 6 was possibly the most consistent season since the first one, and like Ms. Rice said, I think it would deserve a nomination just for the last five minutes. While I’d be happy with any of the actors getting nominated (with the possible exception of Emerson because he always gets in), I’d say the strongest were Matthew Fox and Henry Ian Cusick.
Season 3 was great, and much better than most people give it credit for. The only missteps were Nikki & Paulo, and the awful tattoo episode.
Season 6, however, was the pits. The “sideways” story ended up being a bunch of religious dreck, and all that magic “just because” stuff was used to excuse the fact that Darlton never had any intention of wrapping up the (many) mysteries they created. That ending ruined the entire series.
Yep, couldn’t agree more. Lost, season 6 was one of the weaker ones of the series, but Terry O’Quinn did an amazing job.
Disagree. I think this season belongs to Matthew Fox, and the season as a whole was the best since probably season 2.
Out with the old, in with the new??? The Emmys always nominate garbage that is past it’s prime (ie Monk, Entourage, Two and a Half Men……..)
I agree, I didn’t get that quote. I was just telling my husband last night I don’t even know if I can bring myself to watch this year, if the same shows and actors all get nominated again. They are AWFUL about that.
Brian Cranston is an amazing actor… and he’s proven he can deliver in several genres. So I expect him to win for Best Actor. But I’ll be livid if Matthew Fox isn’t at least recognized. He earned that much with the final season.
I’m still crossing my fingers for Foxy to finally get a nod.
yesyesyes
I agree. This season he was awesome.
Absolutely, he deserves it. So many of the LOST actors were amazing as usual, and of course the show was elevated because of that abundance of talent, but Matthew Fox and the character of Jack really blew me away this season. I really hope he at least gets the nom, but definitely would be nice if he won it.
I would love for LOST, O’Quinn, Emerson and Fox to be nominated. However, I might be asking for too much.
I hope they all are, too.
Keeping my fingers crossed on that. I don’t think it’s asking too much.
Id love Fox to get the nom and win! yes Emerson and Quinn are great but so is Fox!
Loved this season and thte finale left me crying my heart out.
If any show deserves to at least be nominated is LOST. Regardless of what the fans say, especially those that didn’t get “their” answers and those that can’t accept the series finale, LOST had an amazing six-year run. The last season had some of Giacchino’s best musical score, great acting performances and some of the most emotional moments of the entire series. Michael Emerson, Nestor Carbonell, Terry O’Quinn and Matthew Fox all deserve to be nominated for their outstanding performances this last season.
I’ve definitely got to agree with you. This was Lost’s best season yet, and absolutely deserves the nomination, maybe even the award. Plus, it had one of, if not the, best series finale I’ve ever seen.
Glad you included Nestor Carbonell. He deserves a best supporting actor for Ab Aeterno. Brilliant.
Nestor Carbonell was wonderful, they were all so good, it is hard to choose just one!
Yes-so many great performances from the actors you listed. How can you choose? And I have a soft spot for Jorge Garcia. He’s been awesome throughout the entire series and really branched off with his acting this season.
Actually, the critics DID make strong arguments for Battlestar Galactica to win EMMYS for it’s final season…especially EW’s own Marc Bernadin (now with i09.com, I believe,) as well as other critics from EW. No one was surprised that BSG wasn’t nominated because the EMMYS rarely nominate genre shows-especially genre shows on the SCIFI(at the time, before SYFY) channel…not because of the quality of the final season. Google it, Ms. Rice and you will find all the critics articles arguments for nominating BSG. Not to mention ALL of the end of the year lists the show made.
I miss “Lost” so much already. TV sucks without it.
LOST getting nominated for Best Drama is a very long shot, even if it is a phenomenal series. LOST won Best Drama for its first season because the show was not a Sci-Fi show yet. In its first season, LOST was a “drama” show, but as the show progressed, the series’ Sci-Fi elements were explored more and LOST became a cult show. The Emmys tend to ignore genre shows and that is why I doubt LOST will get nominated. I really hope I am wrong.
Lost being nominated is defiantly not a long shot, at all. It has been nominated for the past 2 seasons, when the Sci-fi was in full throttle. Also it was its final season, which bumps it up a lot. It will defiantly be nominated.
This past season was hardly sci-fi. It was a very emotional , contemplative season. It definitely deserves at least a strong nomination. While people may not have liked the pacing of the season, each element was needed for the larger picture.
It is funny you mentioned this, because I was thinking about the series as a whole lately and remembering why I fell in love with Lost in the first place. It is so true when you say that there wasn’t any science in the first season. I loved it for the characters and their stories/struggles on and off the island alone and together (and the flashbacks) and how they were working through it all. It was totally character driven. I loved the dialogue and the group scenes on the island. And Smokey was just a monster to me in the beginning. And I was hooked.
Lost better be up for some awards
terry and Nestor Carbonell gave some top notch stuff .
Nestor deserves a best supporting actor for Ab Aeterno. Raw and brilliant.
Yes – I agree about Nestor Carbonell. He was amazing.
They will give it the same farewell LOST did with their fans..
You mean completely screw it/them?
You’re so negative…They will get nominated and WIN! That’s when they realize that they’re in purgatory.
Lost deserves a few nominations, particularly Matthew Fox (even though a lot of people hate the character of Jack Shepherd). They ignored Carlos Bernard, the actor who should have got nominated from 24 repeatedly, until he was finally off the show. To me the Emmys long ago ceased to be relevant for the reasons mentioned in this article. Certain shows can simply never get nominated. For the two seasons that Battlestar Galactica was easily one of the Top 3 shows on t.v. it stood no shot. Supernatural, which was unquestionably one of the best shows on television two seasons ago, and still excellent this season, will get nothing. Heck if the Emmys can even learn to nominate Friday Night Lights for anything (and that’s on NBC for crying out loud), I’ll be happy.
I have always been a fan of Jack Shephard but this was his best season. So excited he got the nod.
Nope. I think O’Quinn and Emerson will snag nominations (deservedly)and they might get a writing or directing nod. The Best Drama category has too many potential candidates, and a lot of people were disappointed in the finale. And even if they do make it in, they’re NOT going to win. Look for a Mad Men threepeat-yawn.
I would not be surprised if the show netted some repeat nods for Best Drama, Best Supporting Actor – Terry O’Quinn and/or Michael Emerson, Best Direction, etc. I doubt, however, the show will be more prominent than in recent seasons or that perpetually snubbed actors such as Matthew Fox and Jorge Garcia (come on, dude!) will break through. I also don’t see it winning Best Drama again. Lost won for its first, least mythological season and has routinely faltered in the Emmy race because non-regular viewer voters simply cannot make heads or tails out of the sample episodes. Seriously imagine someone seeing the finale as their first taste of Lost in over a year…yeah, you see what I mean.
Lost was a complete quagmire of mystical nonsense and isn’t on the level of Buffy, GG or The Shield.
Did you actually watch the show or are you just criticizing without evidence?
I watched for all six seasons, and sadly couhgrouch is absolutely right. It WAS mystical nonsense. I didn’t think that going into season six, but that’s clearly how it turned out. Honestly, if you liked the finale tell me what exactly you thought was so good or meaningful about not wrapping much of anything up and slapping on some dopey, cliched “Oh, they all went to heaven” ending. What was so compelling about that?
Seriously? Buffy wasn’t a bunch of mystical nonsense? Vampires, demons and the hellmouth? yep, sounds pretty real to me.
WTF is GG?
I hope he means Gilmore Girls and not Gossip Girl
Did you seriously just imply that Gilmore Girls is a better show than Lost? Oh…wow.
Yes, because it is.
WOW CC, you are delusional.
Seriously?? Buffy wasnt a bunch of mystical nonsense? Vampires, demons, and the hellmouth? Yep sounds pretty real to me.