Image Credit: NBC
Every year, when watching the Emmys, is there a point where you find yourself overwhelmed by feelings of déjà vu? It’s understandable if you do. After all, since 2007, the Outstanding Reality Competition Program has nominated the same five series — The Amazing Race, American Idol, Dancing With the Stars, Project Runway, and Top Chef – each and every year.
After hearing the names of the five nominated shows, you may find yourself overcome with a different feeling: frustration. Where’s the love for So You Think You Can Dance? Shark Tank? The Next Food Network Star? How is it that one category has remained so staunchly unchanged when the reality landscape is becoming much more vast and acclaimed?
Blame, for one, the ratings game. “It’s tough for the lower-rated shows to have a chance,” says Tom Forman, CEO of RelativityREAL and creator of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, which has won two Emmys in a different reality category, Outstanding Reality Program. “And there is a perception that a handful of shows, most of them network shows, are somehow of higher quality. And the truth is, look, The Amazing Race is an extraordinary undertaking. And when it premiered, it was probably unquestionably the best competitive reality show on television. [Now], it clearly isn’t. I believe the producers would tell you they win that award when they do a great season, [and] they win that award when they do a less great season. That’s not the way it’s supposed to work…. I’ve won Emmys for Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. We were nominated for exceptional seasons. We were nominated for less exceptional seasons, because it was a big network show that viewers were aware of.”
Ratings also factor into the way the Emmy ballots are worded. John Leverence, the Television Academy’s SVP of Awards, says that the ballots ask voters to choose series “that you have seen and feel are worthy of nomination,” which gives ratings juggernauts like Idol and DWTS an immediate edge. “When you put in a clause ‘that you have seen,’ it’s good odds that our voters are going to have seen more of the top-rated shows,” Leverence says.
In fact, Emmy voters are often accused of not even being aware of all the reality competition shows that are on the air. “It’s the worst-kept secret in Hollywood: The Emmy voters don’t know the shows,” Forman says. “It’s really hard to cut through the perception that there are a handful of quality shows and everything else is crap. The genre has matured, and the good stuff is really good. The bad stuff is admittedly bad. It all tends to get painted with the same brush, and that’s a bit of a bummer for those of us who work in the genre and take it seriously.”
This year, producers at one smaller cable show are taking matters into their own hands. In an effort to get their reality competition show on Emmy voter’s radar, producers for Logo’s RuPaul’s Drag Race decided for the first time to send out For Your Consideration screeners after a grassroots campaign pushing for the cult favorite to score a nod. The effort — jumpstarted after the network saw fans and bloggers taking to the Internet to root for a nom — has gained some traction, as evidenced by their Facebook page, which has scored over 13,500 friends, and this video, which features famous faces rooting for RuPaul to enter the race.
If the grassroots movement worked for two-time Emmy winner Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List (which picked up trophies for Outstanding Reality Program), the network figures it could work for RuPaul. “That was a show I don’t think anybody ever expected to get that kind of attention, let alone win,” Dave Mace, SVP of Original Programming at Logo, says. “It was definitely an inspiration for us, because it proved that you didn’t have to do a huge, expensive campaign to win in that category. You just needed a groundswell of support.”
So far, Logo’s efforts could be working — RuPaul was recently nominated for a Critic’s Choice Television Award. Of course, the five other nominated series were… The Amazing Race, American Idol, Dancing With the Stars, Project Runway, and Top Chef. (American Idol picked up the win.) And it may prove tougher to eke onto Emmy’s list of five nominees as a newbie, even with grassroots support. “You can even get acclaim out there in the Twitter-verse and online and America can be supportive of your show,” Forman says. “But telling Emmy voters to pay attention to a new reality show is hard, because, at the end of the day, it’s really not what they’re watching.”
Is there a way to improve the Outstanding Reality Competition Program category and remedy the déjà vu it evokes each year? Forman thinks having voters check ballots strictly within their own genre might open the door for shows like History’s Top Shot and Bravo’s Work of Art to pick up nominations. “I would quickly tell you that I’m probably not qualified to vote on what makes excellent sound design for a dramatic series,” he says. “[But] within the the reality show community, we watch this stuff really carefully and we think about it and we take it pretty seriously…. I suspect you’d see very different nominations across the board — in every category, but certainly in this one — if you let the folks who really know how to make this stuff do the nominating.”
In the meantime, don’t bother taking risks when it comes to your office pools. The safe bets — Idol, DWTS, Top Chef, Project Runway, and Amazing Race — will probably be the right ones. Silver lining?
Follow Kate on Twitter @KateWardEW
Read more:
Emmy nominations ballots due a week from today! Five burning questions answered.
Why ‘Parks and Rec,’ ‘Community,’ and ‘Justified’ can hope for an Emmy nod: Thank the TCA Awards!
Jane Lynch talks hosting this year’s Emmys: ‘I’m quite calm about it’










I get The Amazing Race and maybe Top Chef — but Idol? Project Runway? The best years of these shows are SO FAR BEHIND them. Drag Race ups the quality every year (on about one millionth the budget). It’s time for Emmy voters to say “condragulations” to Ru and company.
Bizarre Foods with Andrew Zimmerman! Very underrated and has lots of great messages
That’s not a competition show. If we’re talking reality TV in general, Deadliest Catch should win hands down for last season.
Did you see Project Runway last season? It had one of its best seasons in years. Definitely deserves to be nominated this year.
I’d love to see So You Think You Can Dance get in over Dancing With the Stars.
I don’t think it’s the best, but the one I’m enjoying the most these days is American Ninja Warrior. Those guys are incredible!
I agree – Idol is pathetic. Amateur production values, lame judges (reading from a script…) and a cheezy host. Does not deserve to be nominated for anything anymore.
But if they are basing it on ratings, where the heck has Survivor been? It’s a Top 20 show even in it’s 21st and 22nd seasons. No reality show, save The Real World, has been on longer,a nd even it’s weaker seasons are better than most of the reality dreck on TV. Yes, Jeff Probst has won a number of Emmys (as well he should have), but the show should be consistently nominated.
That it didn’t get nominated for it’s heroes vs. villains season was a tragedy.
That season deserved a nomination! It should have been nominated instead of “Amazing Race” and “American Idol,” which both had disappointing seasons in the 2009-2010 television season.
Such an oversight! Survivor was also outstanding this season. It is one show that I never miss. I also love SYTYCD and feel that it is deserving of much more love and accolades.
SYTYCD SERIOUSLY deserves at least a nomination, as does Cat Deeley, who is a far better host than Ryan Seacrest or Heidi Klum could ever hope to be.
you honestly think Survivor was outstanding this season? Both the fall and winter editions were the worst ever–even worse than Thailand!
I like Survivor too. My favorite season was Cook Islands, where they separated the contestants based on race. I am Asian and I wasn’t offended at all. I thought it was very interesting to see which people kept or broke alliances based on race. Plus, Ozzy’s skill in the challenges was ridiculous!
I continue to feel that the Emmys should follow the same rules as radio call in promotions – if you’ve won in the last 30 days, give someone else a chance. But for the Emmys, it would be if you won last year. I’m fine with someone winning in back to back years for 2 different shows – they’re doing something different – but the Amazing Race is still the Amazing Race even if they go to different countries this year. And actors playing the same role on the same show are still playing that character, even if they’re in new episodes.
The Emmy is not a charity. It is for honoring the best work. It would be ludicrous to tell someone “You are still the best, but we are disqualifying you.” Also, it would cheapen the award if everyone knew the best competition wasn’t even nominated.
And it isn’t like a radio call in contest where the winners win based on luck.
Jon Stewart has won 8 consecutive Emmy Awards. I think his winning an Emmy Award is the most predictable part of the show.
This!
I am glad that “The Amazing Race” did not win the Emmy in 2010. The fall 2009 and spring 2010 seasons were both disappointing. The teams were very unlikeable and bland. “Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains” should have gotten the nomination over TAR and “American Idol.” However, TAR was much better in its fall 2010 and spring 2011 seasons. I wouldn’t mind if it won this year.
Maybe you can tell us why that awful “Race” junk always seems to win, as well- GO, RUNWAY !!!!
Runway was terrible this year, as was Idol… put them out to pasture.
Runway was definitely not terrible this year. It was the best season in about 4 years.
I never watch runway, and I don’t understand how Idol is still get the ratings they are getting, when no one likes it or watches it. Now Survivor, this was the best year and I never miss a show. Go Boston Rob…
How about doing away with reality tv awards. They can be considered for technical awards, but how can shows be awarded for showing “reality,” my eyes do that automatically.
I’ll go even further. How about doing away with “reality” TV shows altogether? I’ve never understood what people see in this tripe.
So when you don’t like something, it shouldn’t exist?
How is this any different from the rest of the Emmys? The Emmys are the most predictable of any awards show. The same actors win year after year. The same shows get nominated. I don’t think Emmy voters watch TV at all.
If you try to predict the Emmys you will realize that they are the *least* predictable of all the awards shows. Seriously. Try it. Try to predict the nominees and winners. And calculate your success rate. The best predictors usually clock a 65% correct rate. Compare to the Oscars where it is easy to predict with 95% accuracy.
I can’t fathom why SYTYCD is ignored year after year, but Idol is consistently nominated. And where’s the love for Cat Deeley? She’s easily one of the greatest reality hosts! I’ll take her over Ryan Seacrest any day.
Hear! Hear!
Cat Deeley is a stunning host and she’s incredibly deserving a nomination.
Besides, it’s not like Emmy votes aren’t aware that SYTYCD exists. Plenty of routines from that show get nominated (and win) every year.
Who the hell watches Amazing Race? It wins Outstanding Reality Competition almost every year but I know almost no one that watches it. If that’s the case, then why isn’t Outsourced nominated for Best Comedy or Law & Order: LA nomintated for Best Drama, since we’re recognizing undeserving crap.
So because you and your friends don’t watch it, no one does? TAR consistently has good ratings, so many people watch and enjoy it. Maybe, just maybe, your opinion is incorrect.
no… she is right
Read the EW review each week and the pages of comments and you’ll see who watches it. Almost everyone I know does.
I know a lot of people that watch Amazing Race. It’s a fun show.
Although Amazing Race has gotten less exciting in the recent seasons, lots of people, including myself, still watch it.
What about Wipeout & I Survived a Japanese Game Show? And Big Brother? Then again, how about House Hunters or More Bang for your Buck?
Heh. Heh.
That the Emmys even has reality shows as a category is astounding…
It’s a shame they’ve ignored “So You Think You Can Dance.” If they’d actually watch it, you’d think it’d be a show they’d shower with awards, since it hilights actual talent, artistic statements, the ocassional transcendent moment, through dance, a valuable yet always under valued and under appreciated art form. (The dancers have worked a lot harder on their craft then most actors or singers require). Before SYTYCD the only place to see high calibure dancing like that was perhaps Broadway and PBS, with no vast public showcase for what has become the shows signiture: lyrical/modern. …That show should have at least a half dozen Emmy’s by now, but it can’t even get nominated. It’s probably the biggest awards shame/injustive ever.
Word.
Seeing Nigel Lythgoe’s super ego is a turn off for voters.
He’s why I don’t watch SYTYCD and American Idol. Nigel is a big turn off. UGH!!
Exactly. I think this show deserves to have at the very least been been nominated, if not won, several Emmy’s for many of the past seasons. You can’t autotune or lip-sync dance, and it’s a shame that Dancing With The Stars has been recognized more than SYTYCD.
I have a policy which I have followed for years. I never watch award shows of any kind, consider them a complete waste of time.
I blame the Emmy voters. I think most of them are snobs that have still not accepted reality TV, so they just vote for whoever won the previous year. I was shocked TAR didn’t win again last year.